Variability of late flowering members of the Ophrys mammosa group in North and Northwestern Greece (Macedonia and Epiros) | |||
The mammosa group is the largest and represented by 13 species, in north and northwestern continental Greece. These are O. ferrum-equinum, O. spruneri, O. leucophthalma, O. hystera, O. mammosa, O. macedonica, O. helenae, O. grammica, O. herae, O. hebes, O. epirotica, O. negadensis and O. zeusii. In this special page, species of this group that flower on the late, on May or June, will be presented in alphabetical order. They will be accompanied by brief comments about their characteristics and their differences between each other. The particularities of these late flowering species are that they are closely related, most of them recently described and often growing together. Therefore, their identification in the fields is sometimes intricate. From the presentation, some taxa will be excluded, like O. ferrum-equinum, O. spruneri and O. herae due to their early blossoming time and O. hebes due to the lack of photographic documentation, from this area of Greece. Two, newly described species, O. negadensis and O. zeusii will also be included. The first one maybe belongs to exaltata group, but exhibits similarities to the rest of the members of the mammosa group and usually grows in their proximity. The latter is closely related to O. epirotica, but seems to be separated from it, by its phenotype, environmental habits and different flowering time. For more comments and photographic material about every species, you may follow the links on their names or in the ORCHIDS LIST page. Most of the photos in the following pages are the result of a 6 day trip made in May 2005 (from 19th to 25th), together with James Mast de Maeght. About 40 species of orchids were observed in this trip and special attention was paid to some debatable Ophrys of the mammosa group. These Ophrys are not rare in the forests and fields of Macedonia and Epirus, this particular time of the year, but their recognition and naming is sometimes difficult especially for closely related species, which have been described recently and are not accepted by all the experts. Critical observation and comparison of most of the late members of mammosa complex, in a short time of period, was eventually interesting and conclusive. Summarizing the conclusions, it seems that the questionable O. zeusii has some satisfactory characteristics of a species, separate from O. epirotica. Also that O. negadensis has more restricted distribution and is more close to O. hebes than to O. epirotica or zeusii, or even belongs to the exaltata and not to the mammosa group. Finally, that O. macedonica seems very close to O. epirotica, separated only by the lip length, but sometimes this difference is blurred as sporadic individuals in pure epirotica colonies have lips with a length of 10-12mm. |
Traditional bridge on the road to Kipi
View of Timphi mountain from the west
The hotel "Machalas" in Kipi village (tel: +302653071976 and +306944435100) |
||
Relatively early flowering species (mostly on the beginning of May), easily discriminated from the other members of mammosa group, by the lighter coloration of the basal area of the lip, which is orange-greenish.
Late flowering time, even in low altitudes, usually entire, round and small lip. Discriminated from O. macedonica by the smaller lip (length 7-10mm vs 10-14mm) and from O. zeusii by the later flowering time and entire lip. In middle and late May, O. epirotica plants can be found still bearing many buds, even in low altitudes, which is not the case in Op. zeusii and negadensis. Nevertheless, this species shows the greatest variability in the group and it is not rare to observe, in the same colony, plants with big and divided lips and this fact creates confusions with O. zeusii and macedonica.
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
Easy recognition due to its unique flower coloration and lack of a clear macula design.
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
Differing from O. mammosa by the late flowering time, the longer lip (length: 16-20mm) and the characteristic blue spot of the stigmatic cavity, surrounded by a white line. According to the lip transversal convexity, there are 2 varieties, one with "normal" spreading and one with convex lip.
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
The white pseudoeyes, especially at their external surface and the white stripe on the floor of the stigmatic cavity are the most useful keys of recognition, but sometimes it mixes with related species and transitional forms are making the identification difficult. In the table, for example, you can see plants which are affected by O. mammosa (from Kozani, mixing with them).
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Similar to O. epirotica. The longer lip is the major difference (10-14mm vs 7-10mm). The following plants come from a population with controversial plants, probably mixed with true O. epirotica.
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
While it is the most abundant during April and early May, it is replaced by the rest members of the group, on late May. The only cases of confusion is with O. hystera and leucophthalma, but it has an earlier flowering time, smaller lip than O. hystera and darker pseudoeyes and stigmatic cavity decoration than O. leucophthalma.
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
Its distribution seems restricted to Zagori region of northwestern Greece (Ioannina). It appears to be related to O. hebes and to O. zeusii, or even to be hybridogenic in origin between them, as it usually grows in their proximity. The complete lip pilosity and the relatively early flowering time are the hallmarks of discrimination from O. zeusii (on the 2nd fortnight of May, few plants have flowers in good condition, in contrast to O. zeusii from the same biotopes).
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
Debatable species, closely related to O. epirotica, but also with many differences from it, which are summarized in the table of it's page (see in the link "Ophrys zeusii). Quite common in the edges of deciduous forests of north and northwestern Greece, at altitudes 400-1300m, maybe the most common of the group in these locations, during May.
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
All the late mammosa members, together, for direct comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of the relative lip lengths of seven closely related mammosa members:
No. | Species | Lip length (mm) |
![]() |
|
1 | O.epirotica | 7-10 | ||
2 | O.zeusii | 10-13 | ||
3 | O.macedonica | 10-14 | ||
4 | O.grammica | 9-13 | ||
5 | O.leucophthalma | 10-12 | ||
6 | O.mammosa | 12-17 | ||
7 | O.hystera | 16-20 | ||
....And some hybrids between mammosa members
|
|
|